The Rhetoric to Herennius is the earliest Roman systematic rhetoric,
composed in the first century, BC. Long thought to have Cicero's, it shares
a common approach with Cicero's De Inventione. Derivative of Greek
rhetorical theory, this treatise was broadly influential in Roman antiquity,
throughout the middle ages, and particularly in Renaissance rhetorical
theory. Its fourth book, in particular, contained a detailed dictionary
of rhetorical figures to which countless future authorities turned.
Book I |
Kinds of Oratory
The Five Canons of Rhetoric
Rhetorical Ability
Parts of an Oration
Judicial Oratory
Three Kinds of Stasis/Status (Kinds of Issues) |
Book II |
Parts of a Judicial Oration
Topics for Judicial Oratory |
Book III |
Deliberative Oratory
Epideictic Oratory
Arrangement
Memory
Delivery |
Book IV |
Levels of Style
Qualities of Style
Figures of Diction
Figures of Thought
|
|
1.1 |
Introduction; Need for Practical Application of Rules |
1.2 |
The Orator's Task; Kinds of Causes
- Epideictic
- Deliberative
- Judicial
|
1.3 |
An Orator Must be Capable in
- Invention
- Arrangement
- Style
- Memory
- Delivery
Rhetorical Ability is Via
- Theory
- Imitation
- Practice
|
1.4 |
Introduction to Parts of an Oration:
- Introduction
- Statement of Facts
- Division
- Proof
- Refutation
- Conclusion
|
1.5 |
Judicial Oratory: Introduction (Sections 5-11) |
1.6 |
Direct or Subtle Approach |
1.7 |
Rendering the Audience Attentive, Receptive, Well-Disposed |
1.8 |
Rendering the Audience Well-Disposed (detail) |
1.9-10 |
The Sublte Approach (detail) |
1.11 |
Subtle vs. Direct Approach; Faulty Introductions |
1.12-13 |
Judicial Oratory: Statement of Facts (Sections 12-16);
Kinds of Statements of Facts |
1.14-16 |
Qualities of Statement of Facts |
1.17 |
Judicial Oratory: The Division |
1.18-27 |
Types of Causes:
- Conjectural
- Legal
- Juridical
|
|
|
2.1 |
Invention within Judicial Oratory |
2.2 |
Judicial Oratory: Proof and Refutation |
2.3-12 |
Proofs for a Conjectural Cause (Questions of Fact)
- Probabilty of Guilt
- Comparison to Others
- Signs of Guilt
- Presumptive Proof
- Subsequent Behavior
- Confirmatory Proof
|
2.13-18 |
Proofs for a Legal Cause (Question Concerns Textual Interpretation)
- Letter and Spirit
- Conflicting Statutes
- Ambiguity
- Definition
- Transference
- Reasoning From Analogy
|
2.19-20 |
Proofs for a Juridical Cause (Question Concerns Justice of the
Act Committed) - an Absolute Cause
The Act Accords with
- The Law of Nature
- Statute Law
- Legal Custom
- Previous Judgements
- Equity
- Agreement
|
2.21-26 |
Proofs for a Juridical Cause (Question Concerns Justice of the
Act Committed) - an Assumptive Cause
- Comparison with the Alternative
- Shifting of the Question of Guilt
- Acknowledgement of the Charge
- Rejection of Responsibility
|
2.27 |
Artistic Development of an Argument |
2.28-30 |
Five Parts of a Complete Argument
- Proposition
- Reason
- Proof of the Reason
- Embellishment
- Resume
|
2.31-46 |
Defective Arguments |
2.10 |
Judicial Oratory: Conclusion:
- Summing Up
- Amplification
- Appeal to Pity
|
|
|
3.1 |
Deliberative and Epideictic Causes; Arrangement, Delivery,
Memory |
3.2 |
Deliberative Oratory: Choosing Courses of Action |
3.3-7 |
The Aim of Deliberative Oratory: Advantage (topics) |
3.7 |
Deliberative Oratory: The Introduction, Statement of
Facts, Division |
3.8-9 |
Deliberative Oratory: Proof, Refutation, The Conclusion |
3.10 |
Epideictic Oratory (Praise and Blame):
- External Circumstances
- Descent
- Education
- Wealth
- Kinds of Power
- Titles to Fame
- Citizenship
- Friendships
- Physical Attributes
- Agility
- Strength
- Beauty
- Health
- Qualities of Character
- Wisdom
- Justice
- Courage
- Temperance
|
3.11-13 |
Epideictic Oratory: The Introduction |
3.13 |
Epideictic Oratory: Statement of Facts, Division |
3.13-15 |
Epideictic Oratory: Proof and Refutation |
3.15 |
Epideictic Oratory: The Conclusion |
3.16-18 |
Arrangement |
3.19-23 |
Delivery |
3.24-25 |
Delivery: Voice |
3.26-27 |
Delivery: Gesture |
3.28-29 |
Memory (Natural and Artificial) |
3.30-40 |
Artificial Memory |
|
Book Four
What follows is a broad outline of this important
section. See also the detailed
outline that lists all of the figures included.
|
4.1-10 |
Preface: Digression on Use of Examples in the Rhetoric |
4.11-14 |
Levels of Style:
- Grand
- Middle
- Simple
|
4.15-16 |
Defective Styles:
- Swollen
- Slack or Drifting
- Meagre
|
4.17-18 |
Qualities of Style
- Taste (Latinity and Clarity)
- Artisitic Composition (Avoiding Hiatus, or Excessive Alliteration,
Ttransplacement, Homoeoptoton, or Hyperbaton)
- Distinction (from Figures of Speech, following)
|
4.19-46 |
Style: Figures of Diction (See Detailed
Outline) |
4.47-69 |
Style: Figures of Thought (See Detailed
Outline) |
|